Did you know cigarettes contain polonium-210? Better question…do you know what exactly polonium-210 is and what its effects are?
According to David Sutton, a Philip Morris USA Spokesman, we’ve known about polonium in cigarettes for decades. Though by “we” he means the public health community — not the general public. But never fear, David Sutton doesn’t really see the polonium as a problem because, as he points out, it is a “naturally occurring” substance in nature. Naturally occurring…just like arsenic? Just like poisonous mushrooms? Or snake venom?
Polonium is not a fruit or vegetable — it’s a radioactive substance. And the level of polonium found in cigarettes far exceeds the levels found in nature. The increase comes primarily from the fertilizer used in tobacco farming. Since when are we so lax about radiation?
At any rate, polonium in cigarettes made the news this week due to a new study out of the University of California, Los Angeles, which reviewed 27 previously un-analyzed tobacco industry documents. The documents revealed that tobacco companies new about polonium in cigarettes since at least 1959. The documents also showed that the industry had researched its cancer-causing effects on smokers — and knew exactly the level of radiation a smoker would be exposed to over a period of 20 years.
To add icing to the cake, the documents also showed that the tobacco companies were fully aware of procedure called “acid washing” that vastly decreases the amount of radiation in tobacco. But to this day, the industry doesn’t use it because it would negatively impact nicotine delivery. No nicotine, no dollars.
The revelation that the tobacco industry knew about polonium and its effects and failed to share that information with the public should not come as a surprise — though what is surprising is that, according to ABC, the study’s lead author found the tobacco industry’s level of deception surprising.
However, today’s headlines actually drill home a far more important point — our society has a very short memory. Nearly the exact same story hit the stands in 2008 after the publication of a study by Mayo Clinic and Stanford University.
- Tobacco Firms Kept Quiet on Polonium Role in Cigarettes
- Waking a Sleeping Giant: The Tobacco Industry’s Response to the Polonium-210 Issue
- Polonium-210 Was Hidden In Cigarettes, Says New Study By Mayo Clinic and Stanford University
Leave a comment
- Does your school district have a wellness policy?
- A Dilemma: (Not So) Healthy Public Health Events?
- It’s a McDonald’s world, we just live in it
- This Week in Review
- To shame or not to shame?
- #Winning: Tobacco-Free Campuses
- Using Facebook for Marketing Surveillance
- Pepsi says not to worry
- NYC Soda Ban Debate: Half Empty or Half Full?
- My Take: Disney to restrict junk food advertising
Subscribe via Email
- One health blogger’s change of heart over Pepsi Refresh | Eat Drink Politics on The Problem with Pepsi Refresh
- Angela Hill, Incitrio on Learning from Komen: [Social Media] Crisis Communications!
- Carrie Milford on Learning from Komen: [Social Media] Crisis Communications!
- Megan on Learning from Komen: [Social Media] Crisis Communications!
- Jonathan Ewing on Learning from Komen: [Social Media] Crisis Communications!